CO129-173 - Sir Kennedy - 1876 [1-3] — Page 383

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

380

but as I submit it does not in any degree confer the least title thereby on the Department.

Nar

19. I infer therefore that so far as regards title derivable from a joint agreement, records, perambulation or otherwise the case made out by Colonel Lovell is a complete breakdown. And therefore that all his allusions to the Boundary being well defined, and his proposal that the War Office should have it marked off with Boundary Stones, are inadmissible.

The Boundary at this day where it was fixed by the Governor on the spot, recorded on the spot, remains Evidently as on the 19th October 1853 and where the respective Officers of Ordnance subsequently left it in 1888.

20.

A perfect, distinct Enquiry however still remains viz:- is the ground really required for the use and Comfort of Her Majesty's Troops, because I make bold to say that if I thought so I would be just as anxious as any Ordnance Officer to secure its use to the Military Authorities. That however is a question which can only be decided by Her Majesty's Government, because they alone can really know for how many Troops they intend to provide accommodation:

21. In his letter of the 18th, Para: 10, Colonel Lovell considers in heav...

...ily

Edit History

2026-05-21 08:33:02 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

380 but as I submit it does not in any degree confer the least title thereby on the Department. Nar 19. I infer therefore that so far as regards title derivable from a joint agreement, records, perambulation or otherwise the case made out by Colonel Lovell is a complete breakdown. And therefore that all his allusions to the Boundary being well defined, and his proposal that the War Office should have it marked off with Boundary Stones, are inadmissible. The Boundary at this day where it was fixed by the Governor on the spot, recorded on the spot, remains Evidently as on the 19th October 1853 and where the respective Officers of Ordnance subsequently left it in 1888. 20. A perfect, distinct Enquiry however still remains viz:- is the ground really required for the use and Comfort of Her Majesty's Troops, because I make bold to say that if I thought so I would be just as anxious as any Ordnance Officer to secure its use to the Military Authorities. That however is a question which can only be decided by Her Majesty's Government, because they alone can really know for how many Troops they intend to provide accommodation: 21. In his letter of the 18th, Para: 10, Colonel Lovell considers in heav... ...ily

Baseline (Original)

380 but as I submit inttout in any degree conferring the least title the least title thereby on the Department . Nar 19. I infer therefore that so for as regards and title dewable from a toint agreement, records, perambulation or otherwise the case made out by Colonel Lovell is a complete break down. and therefore that all his allusions to the Boundary being well defined, and his proposal that the War Office should have it marked off with Roundary Stones, are inadmissible. The Boundary at this day where it was fixed by the Governor on the place on the place recorded remains Evidently 19th October 1853 and where the respective Officers of Ordnance subsequently left. It in 1888. 20. A perfectt, distinct Enquiry however still remains viz:- is the or ground really required for the use Comfort of Her Majesty's Froofs, because. I make bold to say that if I thought so I would be just as anxious as any Ordnance Officer to secure it use to the Military Authorities. That however is a question which can only be decided by Ster Majesty's Goodsament. because hove the can really know for how many Troops they intend to provide accomodation : 21. In his letter of the 18th, Para : 10, Colonel Lovell considers in #heay hevesty

2026-05-21 08:33:02 · Baseline

View content

380

but as I submit inttout in any degree conferring the least title

the least title thereby on the Department .

Nar

19. I infer therefore that so for

as regards and

title dewable from a toint agreement, records, perambulation or otherwise the case made out by Colonel Lovell is a complete break down. and therefore that all his allusions to the Boundary being well defined, and his proposal that the War Office should have it marked off with Roundary Stones,

are inadmissible.

The Boundary at this day where it was fixed by the Governor on the place

on the place recorded

remains Evidently

19th October 1853 and where the respective

Officers of Ordnance subsequently left.

It in 1888.

20.

A perfectt, distinct Enquiry however still remains viz:- is the

ground really required for the use Comfort of Her Majesty's Froofs, because. I make bold to say that if I thought so I would be just as anxious as any Ordnance Officer to secure it use to the Military Authorities. That however is a question which can only be decided by Ster Majesty's Goodsament. because hove the can really know for how many Troops they intend to provide accomodation :

21. In his letter of the 18th, Para : 10, Colonel Lovell considers in

#heay

hevesty

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.